vercel-architecture-variantsClaude Skill
Execute choose and implement Vercel validated architecture blueprints for different scales.
| name | vercel-architecture-variants |
| description | Choose and implement Vercel architecture blueprints for different scales and use cases. Use when designing new Vercel projects, choosing between static, serverless, and edge architectures, or planning how to structure a multi-project Vercel deployment. Trigger with phrases like "vercel architecture", "vercel blueprint", "how to structure vercel", "vercel monorepo", "vercel multi-project". |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Grep |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| license | MIT |
| author | Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io> |
| compatible-with | claude-code, codex, openclaw |
| tags | ["saas","vercel","architecture","scaling","patterns"] |
Vercel Architecture Variants
Overview
Choose the right Vercel architecture based on team size, traffic patterns, and technical requirements. Covers five validated blueprints from static site to multi-project enterprise deployment, with migration paths between them.
Prerequisites
- Understanding of team size and traffic requirements
- Knowledge of Vercel deployment model (edge, serverless, static)
- Clear SLA requirements
Instructions
Variant 1: Static Site (JAMstack)
Best for: Marketing sites, docs, blogs, landing pages Team size: 1-3 developers Traffic: Any (fully CDN-served)
project/
├── public/ # Static assets
├── src/
│ ├── pages/ # Static pages (SSG)
│ └── components/ # React components
├── vercel.json # Headers, redirects
└── package.json
// vercel.json { "headers": [ { "source": "/(.*)", "headers": [ { "key": "Cache-Control", "value": "public, max-age=3600, stale-while-revalidate=86400" } ] } ] }
Key decisions:
- No serverless functions needed
- All pages pre-rendered at build time
- ISR for pages that update periodically
- Cost: minimal (mostly bandwidth)
Variant 2: Full-Stack Next.js (Most Common)
Best for: SaaS applications, dashboards, e-commerce Team size: 2-10 developers Traffic: Low to high
project/
├── src/
│ ├── app/
│ │ ├── api/ # Serverless API routes
│ │ ├── (marketing)/ # Static public pages
│ │ └── dashboard/ # Dynamic authenticated pages
│ ├── lib/ # Shared utilities
│ ├── components/ # UI components
│ └── middleware.ts # Edge auth + routing
├── prisma/ # Database schema
├── vercel.json
└── package.json
// vercel.json { "regions": ["iad1"], "functions": { "src/app/api/**/*.ts": { "maxDuration": 30, "memory": 1024 } } }
Key decisions:
- Mixed rendering: SSG for marketing, SSR for dashboard
- API routes in
app/api/for backend logic - Edge Middleware for auth (runs before every request)
- Database in same region as functions
Variant 3: API-Only Backend
Best for: Mobile app backends, microservices, webhook processors Team size: 1-5 developers Traffic: API-driven
project/
├── api/ # Serverless functions (one per route)
│ ├── users/
│ │ ├── index.ts # GET/POST /api/users
│ │ └── [id].ts # GET/PUT/DELETE /api/users/:id
│ ├── webhooks/
│ │ └── stripe.ts # POST /api/webhooks/stripe
│ └── health.ts # GET /api/health
├── lib/ # Shared utilities
├── vercel.json
└── package.json
// vercel.json { "regions": ["iad1", "cdg1"], "rewrites": [ { "source": "/v1/(.*)", "destination": "/api/$1" } ], "headers": [ { "source": "/api/(.*)", "headers": [ { "key": "Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "value": "https://myapp.com" }, { "key": "Access-Control-Allow-Methods", "value": "GET,POST,PUT,DELETE" } ] } ] }
Key decisions:
- No frontend — pure API
- CORS headers for cross-origin access
- Version routing via rewrites (
/v1/*→/api/*) - Multi-region for global API latency
Variant 4: Monorepo with Turborepo
Best for: Multiple related apps, shared component libraries Team size: 5-20 developers Traffic: Varies per app
monorepo/
├── apps/
│ ├── web/ # Main website (Vercel project 1)
│ │ ├── src/
│ │ ├── vercel.json
│ │ └── package.json
│ ├── docs/ # Documentation site (Vercel project 2)
│ │ ├── src/
│ │ ├── vercel.json
│ │ └── package.json
│ └── admin/ # Admin dashboard (Vercel project 3)
│ ├── src/
│ ├── vercel.json
│ └── package.json
├── packages/
│ ├── ui/ # Shared component library
│ ├── config/ # Shared ESLint, TS config
│ └── utils/ # Shared utilities
├── turbo.json
├── pnpm-workspace.yaml
└── package.json
Vercel auto-detects monorepos and builds only the affected app:
// apps/web/vercel.json { "ignoreCommand": "npx turbo-ignore" }
Each app in apps/ is a separate Vercel project with its own domain, env vars, and deployment settings.
Variant 5: Multi-Zone Micro-Frontends (Enterprise)
Best for: Large organizations with independent teams Team size: 20+ developers across multiple teams Traffic: High
Each zone is an independent Vercel project:
Zone 1: marketing.company.com → Marketing team's Next.js app
Zone 2: app.company.com → Product team's Next.js app
Zone 3: docs.company.com → Docs team's Next.js app
Zone 4: api.company.com → Platform team's API-only project
Main project uses multi-zones (next.config.js):
// Main app: next.config.js module.exports = { async rewrites() { return [ { source: '/docs/:path*', destination: 'https://docs.company.com/docs/:path*', }, { source: '/blog/:path*', destination: 'https://marketing.company.com/blog/:path*', }, ]; }, };
Key decisions:
- Independent deploy cycles per team
- Shared auth via Edge Middleware or external IdP
- Consistent design system via shared npm packages
- Each zone has its own env vars and scaling
Architecture Decision Matrix
| Factor | Static | Full-Stack | API-Only | Monorepo | Multi-Zone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team size | 1-3 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 5-20 | 20+ |
| Deploy independence | N/A | Single | Single | Per-app | Per-team |
| Frontend | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Database | No | Yes | Yes | Per-app | Per-zone |
| Complexity | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
| Cost | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Migration Path
Static Site → Full-Stack Next.js → Monorepo → Multi-Zone
↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
Start here Add API routes Add shared Split teams
Add auth packages Independent
Add database deployments
Output
- Architecture variant selected based on team size and requirements
- Project structure implemented following the chosen blueprint
- Vercel configuration optimized for the architecture
- Migration path documented for future scaling
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Monorepo builds all apps | Missing ignoreCommand | Add npx turbo-ignore |
| Multi-zone routing conflict | Overlapping paths | Ensure rewrites don't conflict |
| Shared package not found | pnpm workspace misconfigured | Check pnpm-workspace.yaml includes |
| API-only 404 on root | No public/index.html | Add a minimal index or redirect |
Resources
Next Steps
For known pitfalls and anti-patterns, see vercel-known-pitfalls.
Similar Claude Skills & Agent Workflows
vercel-automation
Automate Vercel tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage deployments, domains, DNS, env vars, projects, and teams.
sentry-automation
Automate Sentry tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage issues/events, configure alerts, track releases, monitor projects and teams.
render-automation
Automate Render tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): services, deployments, projects.
posthog-automation
Automate PostHog tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): events, feature flags, projects, user profiles, annotations.
pagerduty-automation
Automate PagerDuty tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage incidents, services, schedules, escalation policies, and on-call rotations.
make-automation
Automate Make (Integromat) tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): operations, enums, language and timezone lookups.